Skip Nav

16 Integral Pros and Cons of Animal Experimentation

Primary Mobile Navigation

❶Also, if the research conducted is beneficial to humans, it may well be beneficial to animals.

Secondary Navigation

Primary Sidebar
Pro: Life-Saving Medications and Vaccines
Con: Inhumane Treatment in Animal Experimentation

What weve done with Simply Garcinia is concentrate all that HCA inside a tiny vegetable capsule you take three times a day, before each meal, with a glass of water. Where Does it Come From.

Simply Garcinia is naturally extracted from the Garcinia Cambogia fruit found in India and Southeast Asia for its high concentration of HCA (Hydroxycitric Acid). For centuries Garcinia Cambogia has been used in cooking and seasoning of the local foods there.

Unlike other Garcinia supplements, Simply Garcinia contains no fillers, added chemicals or genetically modified ingredients.

Main Topics

Privacy Policy

Cons of Animal Research Using animals in research is a costly methodology. Often it is not even possible without the companies or organizations asking for outside funding from third parties.

Privacy FAQs

The pros and cons of animal research will always be controversial. Testing animals to see if a product is safe may be better than testing humans first, but that also means the life of an animal is devalued.

About Our Ads

Cons of Animal Testing. Animal Welfare Act Is Bypassed The Animal Welfare Act, or AWA, was signed in in order to protect certain animals from cruel treatment. The animals that are chosen for testing are not covered in this act. This is because they carefully choose animals whose rights do not fall under the jurisdiction of the AWA. Jun 13,  · Animal testing is a process that has been going on for centuries for numerous reasons, such as developing medical treatments, determining the toxicity of certain medications, confirming the safety of a product designed for humans, and other health care April Klazema.

Cookie Info

Moreover, the nutrition of cats and dogs has been improved after repeated animal tests. Cons Animal testing statistics are alarming. To discover new medicines and vaccinations, millions of animals are killed every year all across the globe. Animal rights are lost in oblivion when it comes to animal testing ethics. In this part, we focus on the demerits. Fewer animals are used in research than as food for humans Compared to the amount of chicken, cattle, sheep and pigs that humans eat, relatively few of them are used in experimentation. With consideration to the medical progress and advancement such tests provided, it is a small price to pay.