And this money could be spent helping the families and children of the victims. Despite all the negative sides of the capital punishment, there are a lot of pro-death penalty activists. They claim that the person who has acted inhumanly has to be treated the same way. Also, they claim that if other people see how the government punishes people, this will become a deterrent from committing the crimes and violence in the future.
There are also some cruel people that even do not hide the fact that they are looking forward to leaving the prison and continue killing the people. The opposite side claims that if the God gives the chance to live for these people, he gives them the opportunity to reconsider their lives and repent their sins. One of the most important objectives of this group is to abandon the capital punishment.
Since they turned their efforts to eliminate this kind of punishment, 16 countries had given it up. Today, the number is Although the capital punishment is the very harassing procedure, the amount of the crimes in the countries that practice it has never decreased, since it never acted as a deterrent for people.
Three hundred and fifty people have been found not guilty while in death row awaiting execution. One of the most famous cases of the murder of an innocent man was execution of Timothy Evans in He was tried and executed for the murder of his baby daughter Geraldine.
Thus, taking the life of innocent people, we become murderers. On the other hand, the death penalty is the only just punishment for many of the relatives and friends of the victims. It is difficult to live, when you know that the man who killed your loved one is still breathing.
Furthermore, the most common and reasonable argument is that the death penalty is an effective deterrent. The fear of death affects everybody, and criminals are no exception.
If they understand that after the serious crime they must bear such punishment, they should think twice before they commit to it. This argument is supported by statistics which reveal that the crime rate in countries where in this form of punishment still exists is far less as compared to those countries wherein it has been abolished. In conclusion, there are many of pros and cons of the death penalty, but there is no single solution.
Because the issues concerning life and death are always the most difficult. In my opinion, the death penalty is absolutely contrary to moral principles and it is not able to bring us closer to justice. And the question arises: The death penalty is an issue that has the United States quite divided.
While there are many supporters of it, there is also a large amount of opposition. Currently, there are thirty-three states in which the death penalty is legal and seventeen states that have abolished it Death Penalty Information Center.
I believe the death penalty should be legal throughout the nation. There are many reasons as to why I believe the death penalty should be legalized in all states, including deterrence, retribution, and morality; and because opposing arguments do not hold up, I will refute the ideas that the death penalty is unconstitutional, irrevocable mistakes are made, and that there is a disproportionality of race and income level.
The use of capital punishment greatly deters citizens from committing crimes such as murder. Ernest van den Haag, a professor at Fordham University, wrote about the issue of deterrence:. They fear most death deliberately inflicted by law and scheduled by the courts….
Hence, the threat of the death penalty may deter some murderers who otherwise might not have been deterred. And surely the death penalty is the only penalty that could deter prisoners already serving a life sentence and tempted to kill a guard, or offenders about to be arrested and facing a life sentence.
This was due to other possible murderers being deterred from committing murder after realizing thatother criminals are executed for their crimes. Capital punishment also acts as a deterrent for recidivism the rate at which previously convicted criminals return to committing crimes after being released ; if the criminal is executed he has no opportunity to commit crimes again.
Some may argue that there is not enough concrete evidence to use deterrence as an argument for the death penalty. The reason some evidence may be inconclusive is that the death penalty often takes a while to be carried out; some prisoners sit on death row for years before being executed. This can influence the effectiveness of deterrence because punishments that are carried out swiftly are better examples to others. Although the death penalty is already effective at deterring possible criminals, it would be even more effective if the legal process were carried out more quickly instead of having inmates on death row for years.
The death penalty also carries out retribution justly. When someone commits a crime it disturbs the order of society; these crimes take away lives, peace, and liberties from society. Giving the death penalty as a punishment simply restores order to society and adequately punishes the criminal for his wrongdoing. Retribution also serves justice for murder victims and their families. This lack of malice is proven in the simple definition of retribution: The death penalty puts the scales of justice back in balance after they were unfairly tipped towards the criminal.
The morality of the death penalty has been hotly debated for many years. Those opposed to the death penalty say that it is immoral for the government to take the life of a citizen under any circumstance. It is immoral to not properly punish a person who has committed such a horrendous crime.
The criminal is also executed humanely; in no way is he subjected to torture or any form of cruelty. All states that use the death penalty use lethal injection; the days of subjecting a prisoner to hanging or the electric chair are long gone in the US.
Inmates are first given a large dose of an anesthetic so they do not feel any pain Bosner ; this proves that the process is made as humane as possible so the inmates do not physically suffer. Although the issue of morality is very personal for many people, it is important to see the facts and realize that capital punishment does take morality into account and therefore is carried out in the best way possible. The eighth amendment to the United States Constitution prevents cruel and unusual punishment.
Many opponents of capital punishment say that execution is cruel and unusual punishment and therefore violates the Constitution. As was stated earlier, the recipient of the death penalty is treated humanely and is not tortured in any way, shape, or form.
After the anesthetic is administered the person feels no pain; the only part of the process that could be considered painful is when the IV is inserted, but that is done in hospitals on a daily basis and no one is calling it unconstitutional. The Supreme Court has repeatedly upheld the death penalty as constitutional in cases they have presided over. In the case of Furman v. The Supreme Court has not found capital punishment to be unconstitutional, and therefore this argument for abolition is invalid.
Another argument put forth by death penalty abolitionists is the possibility of executing an innocent person. Many people that argue this overestimate how often this happens, it is an extremely rare occurrence and has not happened since the death penalty was reintroduced in Mistakes will be made in any system which relies upon human testimony for proof.
We should be vigilant to uncover and avoid such mistakes. Our system of justice rightfully demands a higher standard for death penalty cases. Stewart points out that death penalty cases are held to a much higher standard.
Essay: Arguments against the Death Penalty. This is the least credible argument against capital punishment. The main cause of such inefficiencies is the appeals process, which allows capital cases to bounce back and forth between state and federal courts for years on end. The title is Arguments against the Death Penalty yet the .
Against Capital Punishment Essay - Against Capital Punishment Currently in the United States, the death penalty is ruled constitutional. This is a mistake, and capital punishment should be unconstitutional.
A variety of justifications for and against capital punishment has been advanced. Often the debates over these justifications become as heated as the debates over. The capital punishment sends a message to the people that the justice system is just there to help the families of the victims of the heinous crimes and not for the accused people who could also be innocent (Kronenwetter 36).
Jul 08, · Essay on Capital Punishment. Essay Against Capital Punishment. Words | 10 Pages. and found his heart still beating. At this time the prison commissioner, who was talking on the line with Governor George Wallace of Alabama, was asked to cancel the execution on the grounds that Mr. Evans was being subject to cruel and unusual punishment. Free essay on Essay Against Capital Punishment available totally free at ct4uc3541.cf, the largest free essay community.